bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 05:27
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 148
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 266
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.42 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 4.39
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 102 129 104 87 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 200
Write 196
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 109
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 22
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 24
22% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 88%
USB Mass Storage Device 64GB
4GB free, PID 121c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 17.2
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 16.6
22% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
39% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3030312E4130304C4620 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback