Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 410 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 90.8 44% 68 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 264 26% 210 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 2,114 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	6.87% Terrible	Lighting 9.17 Reflection 8.38 Parallax 4.16 8% 7.24 fps	MRender 8.43 Gravity 6.97 Splatting 5.96 6% 7.12 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.87% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 230 269 272 275 276 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 372 Write 261 Mixed 180 SusWrite 258 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 27.3 101% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 120 119% 191 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 8 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 9.1 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	760x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	383x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	225x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	148x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	132x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	188x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	181x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	162x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440