Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 206 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 548 61% 478 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1154) 1GB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 361.91 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: A800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 115 152 94 136 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 29.5 Write 98.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 124 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 8 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 11 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	760x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	383x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	225x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	148x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	132x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	188x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	181x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	162x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440