Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G R2.0  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 16:11
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 190
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 568
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 66.7
59% 73.1 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 69
Splatting 75.1
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 247 231 237 209 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 468
Mixed 322
SusWrite 242
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 54
185% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 342
260% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
108GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 396 420 426 427 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 84.5
Mixed 376
SusWrite 411
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 50.2
177% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
191GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 396 420 425 426 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 455
Mixed 443
SusWrite 411
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.2
198% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
135GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.8% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 41
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 18.1
8% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 13.2
43% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 16.1
12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 126%
Wl1000gs A1672 1TB
200GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 36
Write 40
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 17.9
24% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99927-15 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback