Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '15 at 15:03
Run Duration458 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 170
59% 129 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 502
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1.2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5306
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 25.3
22% 30.4 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 31.4
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 356
Mixed 232
81% 368 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 41.1
137% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 101
107% 178 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 134%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
188GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 89
Write 86.9
Mixed 57.4
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.36
102% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
596GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 63.2
Write 72.6
Mixed 58.2
84% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.19
60% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 43%
USB DISK 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Read 8.83
Write 2.51
Mixed 3.82
5% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.73
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
8% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 5%
Typical GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback