Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 20:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 180
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 458
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 13
Parallax 9.22
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 15
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM10H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 203 208 207 200 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 214
Write 147
Mixed 161
SusWrite 205
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 27.5
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 37
35% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback