Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UF
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 00:54
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 205
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 439
50% 390 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1A1E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Lighting 7.33
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 7.78
6% 8.64 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 15.8
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LV000-2G3172 1TB
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 88 99 93 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 14.3
Write 63.3
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 75.3
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback