Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-HD3  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime17.5 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '17 at 13:38
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 473
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 63.7
60% 69.8 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 71.2
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 392
Write 88.9
Mixed 114
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 8.97
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 6.76
74% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 60.1
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 29
34% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
436GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 161
Write 102
Mixed 129
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.14
59% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
393GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 79
Write 124
Mixed 94
74% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.36
104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 72%
Mass Storage Device 2GB
1GB free, PID 121f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 4.36
Mixed 6.01
8% 7.05 MB/s
4K Read 3.89
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
16% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-HD3 Builds (Compare 2,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback