Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 21 '20 at 09:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 120
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 410
40% 328 Pts
64-Core 411
26% 411 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.7% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 97.3
Parallax 87.3
65% 88 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 92
Splatting 89.4
74% 90.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 206 208 202 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 339
Write 203
Mixed 188
SusWrite 200
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 25.7
93% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 64.2
DQ Mixed 33.7
29% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
116GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 62
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 56.5
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
550GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 53.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 56.5
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
353GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46% Average
Read 81.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 78.1
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46%
Great: 83%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
22GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 19 19 11 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 80.5
Write 11.8
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 16.4
34% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
59% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX2133C11D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX2133C11D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback