Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 12:59
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 202
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 619
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 3.44
3% 4.02 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 14 30 7.5 28 9.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 338
Write 212
Mixed 167
SusWrite 18.6
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 20.8
69% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 22.1
17% 23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST1000LM010-9YH146 1TB
836GB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 43 9.9 35 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 71.2
Write 61.7
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 25.1
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
64GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 125 125 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 98.8
Write 101
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 126
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
565GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 101 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 75.5
Write 63
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 103
101% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 63%
HITACHI HTS543232A7A384 320GB
69GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 30.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 31.8
40% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX2133C11D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX2133C11D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 2133, 1600, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $920
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback