Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH P67  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 152
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 456
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.1% Poor
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 86.8
Parallax 154
4% 81.9 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 113
Splatting 17.2
54% 72.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 457 203 155 153 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 438
Write 454
Mixed 382
SusWrite 263
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 29.4
100% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 303
222% 287 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
39GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 256 249 243 237 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 333
Write 231
Mixed 250
SusWrite 246
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29
94% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 146
112% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 98%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
537GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 76 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 74.7
Write 74.4
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 74.3
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB
5GB free, PID 0184
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.2 4.8 5.2 5.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 4.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.9
9% 8.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 14%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB
4GB free, PID 0184
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 0.6
7% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
87% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LU1KFG/8G Transcend JM1600KLH-16GK 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback