Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 09:53
Run Duration347 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 881
84% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.8% Above average
Lighting 30
Reflection 150
Parallax 148
24% 110 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 127
Splatting 115
114% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1082 820 821 812 810 802 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,708
Write 2,514
Mixed 1,928
SusWrite 858
448% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 98.2
330% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,142
861% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 315%
Great: 346%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$185
661GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 497 495 494 497 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 494
Mixed 462
SusWrite 496
111% 493 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 68.2
226% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 373
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 138%
Great: 136%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
422GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 411 303 242 241 251 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 485
Mixed 328
SusWrite 312
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 42.5
157% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 310
232% 311 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
420GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 497 495 495 497 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 494
Mixed 418
SusWrite 496
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 51.5
184% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 124%
Great: 121%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 96 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 100
Write 99.3
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 97.2
119% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 126GB
0GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.9
Write 17.9
Mixed 6
19% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.2
73% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.6
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 25.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback