Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 840 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240415
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '24 at 08:24
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 375
42% 329 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 825 849 837 847 842 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,443
Write 1,689
Mixed 1,228
SusWrite 852
293% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 48.9
166% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 211
200% 326 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 178%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.8% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 14" 1280 720 IVO057F
Typical EliteBook 840 G5 Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback