Huananzhi X79 PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180906
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 10:09
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 86 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 411 44% 349 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 22.2 15% 24.1 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 31.8 21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB 651 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 225 260 296 546 502 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,458 Write 1,298 Mixed 642 SusWrite 352 208% 937 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 21.3 102% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 596 DQ Write 95.8 DQ Mixed 513 333% 402 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 245%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 121GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 68 68 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 67.5 Write 70 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 68.1 86% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown lanshuo 0DH0- PLEXHD 70QB0- PLEXHD 70QB0- lanshuo 0DH0- 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 36.1 MC Mixed 35.1 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.5 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 PLUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 PLUS

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	1x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	2x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x
SSD 120GBEagetBench 54%, 29 samples	1x

RAM
Skill F3-12800CL9-4 Skill F3-10666CL9-4 AMD AE34G1609U2 Skill F3-12800CL9-4 16GBGBench 86%, 5 samples	2x
M393B2G70BH0- 3x16GBSamsungBench 55%, 16 samples	1x
M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 183 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $821

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16