Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170XP-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 212
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 594
59% 483 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 139
Parallax 177
133% 160 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 161
Splatting 113
105% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 1076 1113 1114 954 654 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,841
Write 1,255
Mixed 696
SusWrite 995
266% 1,197 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 50.8
183% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 390
371% 601 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 222%
Great: 283%
Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB
574GB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 129 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 128
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1
330% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 131%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
142GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 77
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 86.6
63% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
112GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 187 186 187 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 115
Write 89.2
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 187
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
230GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 15.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 15
30% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 36%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
352GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 89 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 144
Write 148
Mixed 90
SusWrite 89.7
156% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 60%
CENTON 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.8 6 4 3.9 4.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 6
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.6
11% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2800C16-8GRR 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 04CD F4-2800C16-8GRR 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170XP-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $637
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback