Today's hottest deals

MSI X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7760
MotherboardMSI X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '17 at 10:10
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 680
68% 555 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 140
Parallax 133
111% 136 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 132
Splatting 102
93% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
86GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 418
Mixed 422
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 41
164% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 94.9
110% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 63.7
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.16
64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
113GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 96.9
Mixed 97.1
74% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.61
128% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 68%
ADATA HD710 1TB
172GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 94.9
Write 73.6
Mixed 65.2
95% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.19
46% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 40.9
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760) Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760) - $342

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback