Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	240GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 240GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 159 User benchmarks, average bench 47% None, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 68.2 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 164 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 603 54% 457 Pts	64-Core 2,161 134% 2,161 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 376GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 384 389 384 386 386 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 91%
Samsung MZ7LM960 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 894GB free Firmware: 0M3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 415 417 413 415 414 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 430 Write 417 Mixed 355 SusWrite 414 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 20.1 65% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 225 167% 219 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 112%
Samsung MZ7LM960 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 884GB free Firmware: 0M3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 409 412 408 410 408 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 421 Write 414 Mixed 346 SusWrite 408 90% 397 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 18.9 63% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 68.1 DQ Mixed 129 91% 118 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 67GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 0, 0, 0 MHz 3968, 32767, 32767 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 62.6 MC Write 50.6 MC Mixed 50.7 156% 54.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 14.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 412%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16