Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '17 at 13:16
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$71
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 319
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 19.5
18% 22.3 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 24.1
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASD25-MLC256G-CT-160-1 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: AD140815 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.7% Good
Read 268
Write 248
Mixed 249
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 27.2
90% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 73.7
82% 139 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 84%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 256GB-$48
238GB free
Firmware: SAFM001A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.5% Average
Read 267
Write 211
Mixed 218
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 10.9
62% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 18.2
56% 123 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 110%
ASD26-MLC128G-CT 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VAB3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.4% Good
Read 488
Write 288
Mixed 323
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 21.9
72% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 68.9
93% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
319GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 85.4
Mixed 69.1
62% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.27
93% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 84%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
466GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 27.6
Mixed 17.5
31% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.53
89% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback