Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX Z270I GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 11:03
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$134
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 660
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 75
Parallax 69.1
57% 71.3 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 67.1
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R090 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 1223 964 668 509 512 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,973
Write 1,413
Mixed 1,237
SusWrite 744
299% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 81.2
309% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 554
504% 762 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 258%
Great: 311%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
106GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 354 318 320 320 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 432
Mixed 416
SusWrite 306
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.5
172% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 296
225% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
ASD25-MLC256G-CT-160-1 256GB
47GB free
Firmware: AD140815
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 279 280 283 282 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84% Excellent
Read 449
Write 283
Mixed 276
SusWrite 264
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 32.7
124% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 181
159% 237 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
50GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 103
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
334GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 130 128 133 129 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 69.9
Write 69.3
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 125
108% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 135 135 137 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 135
Write 131
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 129
153% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
194GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 59 59 60 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 53.8
Mixed 34
SusWrite 57.5
69% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 29%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
15GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 90 89 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
Read 83.9
Write 92.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 90.4
99% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 129 131 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 61.2
Write 59.7
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 131
102% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-102.A00G 9905678-023.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270I GAMING Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback