Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 21:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 124
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 354
34% 282 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 80.7
54% 71.3 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 55.6
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 306
Write 255
Mixed 224
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 16.8
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 18.3
24% 42 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
365GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 149
Write 156
Mixed 83.8
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 5.43
4K Mixed 0.71
216% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A TMS4GB364E081 9905474-060.A 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback