MSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7895
MotherboardMSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 09:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 62
2-Core 112
46% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 188
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 39.3
26% 34 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 34.3
27% 32.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 129 70 106 87 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 322
Write 244
Mixed 230
SusWrite 115
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 19.4
79% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 143
120% 173 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 87%
WD WD1200JS-00MHB0 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 43.8
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 6.8
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895) Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback