MSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7895
MotherboardMSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 113
54% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 177
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 39.5
26% 34.3 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 32
Splatting 35
27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 46.9
Write 303
Mixed 41.9
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 28.1
113% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 170
138% 196 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
WD WD12 00JS-00MHB0 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 60.5
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 59.5
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895) Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback