Today's hottest deals

Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G73Jh  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 21:27
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 91.6
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 85.6
51% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 195
21% 165 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.69
7% 8.76 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.64 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 72 76 74 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 76.4
Mixed 43
SusWrite 65.2
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 80AD HMT451S6AFR8A-PB ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback