Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F2
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 13:09
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 64
2-Core 116
55% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 162
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 6.03
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 10.7
6% 7.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 58 76 78 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 97.5
Write 93
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 74.2
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 15.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback