Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F3
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 164 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 243 33% 245 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.14% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 6.62 5% 7 fps	MRender 8.67 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 13.4 8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.14% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 74 73 75 73 72 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 424 Write 232 Mixed 286 SusWrite 102 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 32.2 134% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 187 162% 237 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 86%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID c95a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 8.3 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Read 11.4 Write 7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 8.1 10% 8 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.8% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	189x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	83x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	50x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	266x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	85x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	39x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $99Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	14x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	74x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406