Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 226
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 3.66
3% 3.66 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.21 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 82 72 68 81 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 191
Write 110
Mixed 151
SusWrite 74.4
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 26.6
107% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 63.6
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 70.1
58% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
31GB free
Firmware: 21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 70.4
Write 69.1
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 67.6
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 59%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID c95a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.9 8.8 8.9 8.7 8.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 31
Write 7
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 8.7
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback