Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 07:57
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 518
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 38.4
36% 41.6 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 35.3
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,075
Write 2838
Mixed 2,342
613% 2,752 MB/s
4K Read 185
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 133
522% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 722
DQ Mixed 676
541% 761 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
251GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 426 431 425 401 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 380
Write 428
Mixed 334
SusWrite 422
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 39.8
126% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 426 431 425 401 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 189
Write 162
Mixed 315
SusWrite 422
62% 272 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 29.1
108% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 137 114 130 135 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 88%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.4
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback