Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Latitude E6520  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0J4TFW
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '17 at 06:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 404
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M
Dell(1028 0494) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 296.79
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
70GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 512
Write 375
Mixed 168
77% 352 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 33.7
108% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 129
139% 235 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 502
Write 341
Mixed 250
80% 364 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 18
81% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 65.7
104% 203 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 99U5428-063.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6520 Builds (Compare 1,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback