Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 19:37
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7400-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 43.5
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 52.2
30% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 59
8-Core 72.2
8% 65.6 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
XFX(1682 2353) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 0.25
1% 1.08 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT722516DLA380 165GB-$32
66GB free
Firmware: V43OA96A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 47
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 20.3
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 35%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.4 5.5 13 16 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 21.5
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 11.9
14% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.9 4 4 3.8 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.9
7% 6.03 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback