Acer Aspire 5100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5100  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Navarro
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 08:35
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 52.2
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 24.1
25% 32.5 Pts
4-Core 23.7
8-Core 24.8
3% 24.2 Pts
64-Core 19.5
1% 19.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress
Acer(1025 009F) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.15
0% 0.13 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500BEVE-00WZT0 250GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.6 11 18 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 14.3
6% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 31%
Lexar microSD RDR 2GB
1GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.4 7.1 7 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 9.2
Write 6.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7.2
9% 6.8 MB/s
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
46% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.71% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback