Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 17:35
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 225
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 714
70% 576 Pts
64-Core 897
56% 897 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 65.6
55% 67.1 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 67
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 14 12 68 84 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 447
Write 349
Mixed 297
SusWrite 81.7
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 19.5
75% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 45
50% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
133GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 73.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 54
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 23.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback