Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 09:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4920
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 164
56% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 160
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 3.62
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 9
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 187 192 188 196 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 82
SusWrite 185
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 13.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback