Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4920
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 65
2-Core 87.8
46% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 112
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 64 92 28 113 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 54%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 5.2 5.2 4.7 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Read 8.4
Write 0.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.8
4% 4.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 75 19" 1280 720 SAM01E1 SyncMaster
Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback