Today's hottest deals

CMS 7200-5702A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCMS 7200-5702A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 16:36
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 693
66% 547 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 52.6
49% 56.2 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 0.09
28% 39.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 46 1.3 53 136 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 461
Write 379
Mixed 241
SusWrite 80.1
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 15.6
68% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 43.3
46% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
866GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 203 202 199 202 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 194
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 199
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5702A Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: CMS 7200-5702A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback