Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 08:02
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 704
73% 587 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 86.7
51% 70.5 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 46.2
50% 63.5 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Braveeagle 4 480GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 407 411 418 419 417 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 438
Mixed 405
SusWrite 420
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 46.6
152% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 120
158% 285 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 50.9
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback