WYSE XM CLASS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWYSE XM CLASS  (all builds)
MotherboardInventec XM CLASS
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 15:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T56N
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 32.9
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 35.3
19% 29.2 Pts
4-Core 37.2
8-Core 14.2
4% 25.7 Pts
64-Core 25.7
2% 25.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
AMD(1002 9806) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 35 44 39 27 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 40.8
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 36.7
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 484D543435315336 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XM CLASS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: WYSE XM CLASS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback