Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 116 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 18 2-Core 34.5 31% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 27.7 8-Core 35.7 4% 31.7 Pts	64-Core 38.3 2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9806) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 92 102 103 102 102 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 106 Write 112 Mixed 113 SusWrite 99.7 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 10.9 45% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 35.8 29% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4239334445 1x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 13%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25