Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory5.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 09:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 44.3
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 58.1
28% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 85.8
8-Core 82.4
11% 84.1 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 8.78
0% 5.35 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 5.87
5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 1.7 4.1 105 2.4 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.6% Poor
Read 256
Write 179
Mixed 172
SusWrite 34.3
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 14.5
49% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.9
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 48.1
36% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
316GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 97 96 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 99
Write 103
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 95.9
61% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3190ME76F8F1600 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 10GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback