bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61CR
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 19:44
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 114
49% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 303
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.5% Average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 71.5
38% 60.4 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 51.2
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 67 15 24 72 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 190
Write 94.5
Mixed 178
SusWrite 62.1
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 22.1
79% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 111
106% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 144 151 153 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 170
Mixed 32
SusWrite 153
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$112
181GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 73 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 81.2
Write 87
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.5
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback