Asus UL30JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus UL30JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UL30JT
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 15:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 U 430
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 92.2
43% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 101
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 92.8
6% 92.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1362) 3.8GB
Driver: Ver. 12.29.43.658
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 0.69
0% 1.26 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 222 226 229 228 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.7% Above average
Read 242
Write 230
Mixed 171
SusWrite 227
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 19.2
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 168
131% 180 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UL30JT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UL30JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback