bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 01:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 5218
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 87
2-Core 172
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 248
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 130E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 83.8
Reflection 105
Parallax 88.6
68% 92.4 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 26.1
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52%
Great: 55%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 493GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 160 154 154 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 216
Write 219
Mixed 230
SusWrite 157
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 10.6
43% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 46.7
38% 51.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback