Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '20 at 00:31
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 75.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 1,005 89% 754 Pts	64-Core 2,542 157% 2,542 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8673) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.8% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 115 Parallax 102 93% 110 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 131 Splatting 108 113% 143 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 709GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1626 1815 1905 1897 1882 1904 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,256 Write 1,948 Mixed 1,386 SusWrite 1838 417% 1857 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 56.8 183% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 423 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 418 303% 394 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 425%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90 12,565 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 192GB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,597 Write 3,311 Mixed 3,276 758% 3,395 MB/s	4K Read 172 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 116 471% 135 MB/s	DQ Read 994 DQ Write 866 DQ Mixed 910 688% 923 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
WDS200T3XHC-00SJG0 2TB 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 684GB free Firmware: 102430WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1576 1544 1219 1150 1300 1285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,847 Write 2,127 Mixed 1,669 SusWrite 1,346 394% 1,747 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 53.9 185% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 466 DQ Write 416 DQ Mixed 428 325% 437 MB/s
Poor: 191% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 306%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 119GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 106 108 109 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 108 Write 102 Mixed 102 SusWrite 107 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 85%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 317GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 43 40 43 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 141 Write 58.1 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 45.2 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0 22% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 98%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: JKAOA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 83 82 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 123 Write 126 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 81.8 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 69%
NORELSYS 106X 256GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 236GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 145 144 189 188 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 246 Write 186 Mixed 194 SusWrite 160 258% 197 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 21.3 1,885% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 41 DQ Mixed 22.4 2,230% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 174%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 8x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 144% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	MC Read 69.6 MC Write 61.8 MC Mixed 66.8 189% 66.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 42.9 SC Mixed 27.9 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 183%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	247x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	71x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $834

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16