Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210715
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 73.7 1-Core 131 2-Core 263 84% 156 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 1,041 92% 782 Pts	64-Core 2,688 166% 2,688 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8673) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3655 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 157 Parallax 106 96% 127 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 138 Splatting 117 118% 149 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 798GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1960 1981 1991 1995 2006 2000 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2,445 Write 2,254 Mixed 1,405 SusWrite 1989 454% 2,023 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 69.1 231% 80.3 MB/s	DQ Read 972 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 828 605% 799 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 425%
WDS200T3XHC-00SJG0 2TB 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 491GB free Firmware: 102430WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2169 1868 1296 1293 1315 1288 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 1,876 Write 2,156 Mixed 1,752 SusWrite 1,538 413% 1,830 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 60.8 218% 84.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,065 DQ Write 826 DQ Mixed 922 696% 938 MB/s
Poor: 191% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 306%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 159GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,843 Write 4,229 Mixed 4,411 1,002% 4,494 MB/s	4K Read 286 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 169 734% 205 MB/s	DQ Read 1,046 DQ Write 867 DQ Mixed 934 706% 949 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 197GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 123 123 121 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 90.5 Write 96.2 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 122 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 98%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 301GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 130 132 132 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	71% Very good	Read 116 Write 104 Mixed 111 SusWrite 131 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 121 125 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 48.5 Write 58.4 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 122 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 69%
NORELSYS 106X 256GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 238GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 108 100 98 116 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 101 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 102 152% 128 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 21.4 2,028% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 42.2 DQ Mixed 25.2 2,364% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 174%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 8x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 144% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	MC Read 74.4 MC Write 75.6 MC Mixed 70 210% 73.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 44.7 SC Mixed 29.4 89% 31.3 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 183%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	247x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	71x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $834

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16