Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion NY464AAR-ABA p6130y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion NY464AAR-ABA p6130y  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON VIOLET
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 01:17
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9750
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 58.1
34% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 92.4
8-Core 139
14% 116 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9100
HP(103C 2A81) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8780
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1
1% 0.88 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 67 29 73 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 22.3
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 79.2
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback