Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 07:17
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 35.8
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 130
43% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 198
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.36
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.36 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 5.13
3% 3.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 317 311 321 327 327 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 333
Write 329
Mixed 312
SusWrite 316
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 33.8
118% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 407
298% 388 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 16.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback