Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JB
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 03:12
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 68%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Memory 7.26
1-Core 50
2-Core 36.4
18% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 72
8-Core 140
13% 106 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 183F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 3.8
0% 4.63 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 290 278 269 320 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 754
Write 523
Mixed 667
SusWrite 292
125% 559 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 21.3
73% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 97.6
93% 146 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 51 46 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 41
Write 68.8
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 48.8
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FRS 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 13.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 430
9% 430 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_X509JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback