Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-58  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Strongbow_CM
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 18:09
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 96%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Memory 9.79
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 12.2
6% 9.56 Pts
4-Core 25.9
8-Core 53.2
5% 39.5 Pts
64-Core 48.2
3% 48.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 140E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 149 183 198 214 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 288
Write 188
Mixed 208
SusWrite 186
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 8.6
32% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 76.5
51% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 35%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FRS 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 406
10% 406 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-58 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback