HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C1
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 57.2
32% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 150
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 80C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 3.09
2% 3.04 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 5.57
3% 3.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 63 62 56 69 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 67
Mixed 44
SusWrite 60.3
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 10 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 11.7
19% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
87% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
44GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 9.5
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 11.2
14% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 7.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback