Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8266
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191227
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 05:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8570E R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 36.9
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 92.6
36% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 87.3
12% 88.8 Pts
64-Core 83.9
5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8266) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.10.02
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 6.22
4% 6.23 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.87
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC313 HFS256G32TNF-N3A0A 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 257 240 253 259 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 393
Write 352
Mixed 345
SusWrite 258
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 26.4
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 184
140% 189 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback