Lenovo 10VMS0GD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10VMS0GD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3130
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8570E R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 83.3
46% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 94.6
13% 97.8 Pts
64-Core 98.4
6% 98.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3130) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.26.27
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 237 257 240 308 309 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 370
Write 297
Mixed 192
SusWrite 264
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 28.3
109% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 132
115% 173 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback